Very helpful! Detailed and clear explanations. Now I totally understood. Thank you very much.
Have a great weekend! Joan On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Deborah Fritz <debo...@marcofquality.com>wrote: > ** > Joan, > > The 264 field was made valid in 2011 as one of the fields needed to > provide more granularity in recording data when following RDA instructions, > but it has only recently begun to show up in MARC records. > > The wording for input conventions for the 264: "Field 264 is useful for > cases where the content standard or institutional policies make a > distinction between functions", could be 'translated' as "The RDA content > standard makes a distinction between Production, Publication, > Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice functions (RDA 2.7, 2.8, > 2.9, 2.10, 2.11), so the 264 is useful for coding this type of data, when > following RDA instructions" > > RDA > 2.7 Production statement = 264 I2 = 0 > 2.8 Publication statement = 264 I2 = 1 > 2.9 Distribution statement = 264 I2 = 2 > 2.10 Manufacture statement = 264 I2 = 3 > 2.11 Copyright date = 264 I2 = 4 > > The wording for input conventions for the 260: "Field 260 is useful for > cases where the content standard or institutional policies used do not make > a distinction between functions", could be 'translated' as "The AACR > content standard does not make a distinction between Production, > Publication, Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice functions > (AACR 1.4) so the 260 is useful for coding this type of data, when > following AACR instructions" > > AACR > 1.4 PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC., AREA = 260 > > In an attached email, Adam Schiff pointed us to a set of PCC guidelines > for the 264, available at: > *http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/264-Guidelines.doc*<http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/264-Guidelines.doc> > > Hope this helps, > Deborah > > > ------ > Deborah Fritz > MARC Database Consultant > The MARC of Quality > www.marcofquality.com > Voice/Fax: (321) 676-1904 > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang > *Sent:* Friday, July 13, 2012 11:16 AM > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* [RDA-L] 260 and 264 field > > Hi, fellows > > Let you know first, I am still learning RDA. Anybody would like to be my > teacher and explain the new field 264 field? I am a kind of confused with > it. In RDA Toolkit, the filed 264 does not appear in the mapping of RDA > elements with MARC field, but it is used in RDA MARC records examples. What > is the differences between 260 and 264? I checked Library of Congress MARC > format webpage, and found something like "Field 264 is useful for cases > where the content standard or institutional policies make a distinction > between functions". The similar sentence also appears in the note under > 260. Any more information or examples? > > Thank you very much. > > Joan > -- > Joan Wang > Cataloger -- CMC > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x209 > 618.656.9401Fax > > -- Joan Wang Cataloger -- CMC Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) 6725 Goshen Road Edwardsville, IL 62025 618.656.3216x209 618.656.9401Fax
