RDA 2.4.2.2. lists the same source as the title proper only as first in order of preference. Second in order of preference is another source within the resource. I believe it is the other title that must come from the same source as the title proper, but the SoR is not covered by the other title instruction. Since an SoR taken from the verso t.p. is within the resource, it isn't bracketed.
Steven Arakawa Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation Catalog & Metada Services Sterling Memorial Library. Yale University P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 (203) 432-8286 steven.arak...@yale.edu -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Don Charuk Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:22 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] SOR from copyright statement This raises another question. If the author is provided on the title page and the illustrator is provide on the title page verso can they both be transcribe in the statement of the responsibility? Does not the rule 2.4.2.2 state the SOR should come from the same source as the title proper. If so interpreted, would/could you not make a note for the illustrator according to rule 2.20.3?
