no2013093410 Adémar, $c de Chabannes, $d 988-1034. $t Works. $k Selections
(Opera liturgica et poetica)
n 85278491 Anastasius, $c Sinaita, Saint, $d active 640-700. $t Works. $k
Selections $s (Sermones duo in constitutionem hominis secundum imaginem Dei)
no2010055326 Raabe, Wilhelm, $d 1831-1910. $t Works. $k Selections (Knaur
Klassiker)
n 83731844 Friml, Rudolf, $d 1879-1972. $t Works. $k Selections (Rudolf Friml
music & piano playing series)
no2012109956 Raabe, Wilhelm, $d 1831-1910. $t Correspondence. $k Selections
(Fehse)
no 00038058 Coward, Noel, $d 1899-1973. $t Works. $k Selections (Methuen
Publishing Ltd.)
no 99050925 Foote, Horton. $t Plays. $k Selections (Newbury, Vt.)
The final three illustrate other choices for the qualifier besides date or
manifestation title of the compilation. Some of the examples are series
authority records, but the principle is the same as for other types of
aggregate works. For series we were already adding an additional qualifier to
distinguish them. Now we are doing it for all works.
The second example probably should not have subfield $s preceding the
parenthetical qualifier.
Adam Schiff
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Wilson, Pete wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:44:25 +0000
From: "Wilson, Pete" <pete.wil...@vanderbilt.edu>
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
<RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 6.2.2.10 and 6.27.1.9
Adam--Can you give any examples of NACO authority records that have qualifiers like your
"Best of X's poetry?" I have been unable to turn any up and am curious.
Thanks.
Pete Wilson
Vanderbilt University
-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam Schiff
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 6:19 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 6.2.2.10 and 6.27.1.9
They are considered separate compilation works, assuming that they have
different contents. The PCC NACO training says to add additional work element
(date, place of origin, or other distinguishing characteristic) to the
conventional collective title. The date is probably NOT the best thing to add,
although it's one option. Many NACO libraries are adding the title proper of
the collection instead, since it may better aid in identification, for example:
X. Poems. Selections (Best of X's poetry)
Some catalogers are not happy with this practice, and would prefer to consider
the title of the compilation to be the preferred title by which the compilation
is known. LC's policy, however, implies that the compiled work does not become
known by its title except through the passage of time (e.g.
Whitman's Leaves of Grass), and that for newly published compiled works, a
conventional collective title must be used instead.
Incidentally, although the RDA instructions do seem to be clear that the date
would be added in parentheses as you have done, in practice in MARC these are
being added in subfield $f following a period:
X. $t Poems. $k Selections. $f 2010
Adam Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
-----Original Message-----
From: Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 12:41 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] 6.2.2.10 and 6.27.1.9
I am uncertain about the relationship of 6.2.2.10 (Recording the Preferred
Title for a Compilation of Works of One Person, Family, or Corporate Body) and
6.27.1.9 (Additions to Access Points Representing
Works) - both in theory and in practice.
If I've got two different collections of works of the same creator, e.g.:
"Selected poems / X"
"Best of X's poetry"
Both get the collective title "Poems. Selections" according to 6.2.2.10.2.
But for the AAP, am I now supposed to add some additional attribute according
to 6.27.1.9, e.g.:
X. Poems. Selections (1995)
X. Poems. Selections (2010)
In short, my question is whether RDA considers the two different poetry
collections as two different works (which must then be distinguished in the
AAP) or as the same work (then, of course, no additional attribute would be
necessary in the AAP).
I'm also interested in the general practice. I know that LC used to add dates
(at least in the case of complete works and selected works), but that this
practice has now been abandoned. So I assume that LC now never distinguishes
between different collections of the same type. What do others do?
Heidrun
--
---------------------
Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
Stuttgart Media University
Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the
address you are subscribed under to:
lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
In the body of the message:
SIGNOFF RDA-L
To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the
address you are subscribed under to:
lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
In the body of the message:
SIGNOFF RDA-L
To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the
address you are subscribed under to:
lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
In the body of the message:
SIGNOFF RDA-L
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the
address you are subscribed under to:
lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
In the body of the message:
SIGNOFF RDA-L
