There is an proposal in the pipeline for NEC 2014 that makes an exception for AC PV modules after the wiring enters the building. See: http://www.solarabcs.org/codes-standards/NFPA/pdfs/2014NEC%20690.31(E).pdf -- Dan Fink, Executive Director; Otherpower Buckville Energy Consulting Buckville Publications LLC NABCEP / IREC accredited Continuing Education Providers 970.672.4342 (voicemail)
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:19 AM, David Brearley < david.brear...@solarprofessional.com> wrote: > FWIW: In the 2011 Code, Section 690.31(D) is changed to include the > following: > > "Where dc photovoltaic source or output circuits…are run inside a building > or restructure, they shall be contained in metal raceways,*Type MC > metal-clad cable that complies with 250.118(10*), or metal enclosures…" > > > On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Nick Vida wrote: > > Hello wrenches, > > wondering if any of you are running into inspectors wanting EMT in the > attics, or allowing flex only if there is a fusible disconnect on the roof. > We have heard this a few time lately and havent yet seen a code reference, > (except 690.31e saying metal raceways are fine- not specifying EMT only). I > am wondering if this is a new wave of inspectors wanting the future now as > informed by an expert seminar, or if there is something I am not aware of. > Any comments are very appreciated. > > Thank you, > > Nick Vida > wrench > >
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org