+1. John Wiles is awesome—and he would never mistake PV source or array 
circuits for a service. Not only are PV power circuits not a service, but PV 
systems (inverter output circuits) are not a service. The NEC defines all of 
this as power production equipment (705.2). 

By definition a service can only be provided by a "serving utility" (Article 
100). That definition does not apply to PV systems. Having said that, Section 
230.82(6) does allow PV systems to connect to the supply side of a service 
disconnect. But that allowance doesn't magically change the PV system into a 
service; it is still (parallel) power production equipment.

If you're still in the planning phase, Nick, it is a good idea to see if they 
will allow you to use MC "that complies with 250.118(10)" according to 
690.31(E) in NEC 2011. 

DCB


On Nov 9, 2012, at 7:44 AM, Dave Click wrote:

> Nick, what the AHJ is telling you may actually be in reference to 250.97; for 
> most PV output circuits (yes these are necessarily dc) this bonding 
> requirement applies since array VOC > 250 VDC. As Kent just pointed out, 
> these dc conductors clearly don't meet the NEC definition of a service.
> 
> "250.97 Bonding for Over 250 Volts. For circuits of over 250 volts to ground, 
> the electrical continuity of metal raceways and cables with metal sheaths 
> that contain any conductor other than service conductors shall be ensured by 
> one or more of the methods specified for services in 250.92(B), except for 
> (B)(1)..." followed by an exception.
> 
> Seems that FMC is OK as an EGC if your conductors have <20A OCPDs, which I 
> imagine you do, but that FMC also can't be longer than 6' (see 250.118(5)). 
> So I think your AHJ is probably right and I just learned something. If you're 
> running a separate EGC anyway, you may want to ask why this bonding business 
> is so important-- but I don't have an NEC reference on this to help you argue 
> this. Maybe the AHJ would allow you to just run MC cable as the 2011 NEC 
> allows.
> 
> John Wiles is awesome. Someone on this list had to say it.
> 
> DKC
> 
> On 2012/11/8 23:22, Nick Vida wrote:
>> Hi Wrenches,
>> 
>> Thanks for you comments. Fun for the day is hearing they want to apply
>> section 230 about service conductors and say that flex is not
>> a metallic raceway because it is no good for bonding. They are defining
>> the pv source circuits as a service.
>> I am getting a distinct Wiles vibe here.
>> 
>> I find it so annoying when they try to put out these distinctions with
>> no code, no city ordinance and not even an internal memo, especially
>> when they remain obstinate without going to the trouble to actually
>> legitimize the interpretation.
>> 
>> Dan- are the output circuits necessarily DC? I would have to look at NEC
>> for a minute, but it doesn't seem to add up to me right now.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Nick Vida
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> Options & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Options & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to