A "metal underground water pipe" is still a "pipe" in all cases, so I think I'm missing your inspector's logic. A water main is always going to be made out of pipe, so I think the exception to 250.166 (C) should always apply. (unless some places make them square?;-) ) The difference in pipe between 250.52A1 and A5 is that one is a pipe set in the ground by an electrician with the sole purpose of being a grounding electrode, while the other is used for water and is set by the plumber. The reason I heard that water lines into the house had to have supplementary grounding is that they often transition to PVC and so aren't always continuous metal. They also might be cut and changed later by a plumber. That also was a change from earlier code, that used to allow the water main to be used as the sole grounding electrode. EIther way, 250.166 does not make a distinction, it just says "Pipe" and would cover all GEC connections.

The 4/0 GEC horror stories probably are from earlier editions of the code. BIll Brooks can tell us when that changed. My guess is that it was a pre 2002 code requirement, as I saw that on 90s PV systems. Your final suggested install should be code compliant with all the various NEC sections (IMHO); just use a lay in lug type pipe grounding clamp, to keep the GEC continuous to the rod. Some of this code stuff makes you wonder whether we should have studied law to be a Wrench.....(ugh)

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 4/17/2013 7:44 AM, Garrison Riegel wrote:
Hi Ray,

Not saying he was right, but it was explained to me by an inspector that the
pipe electrode mentioned in 250.166(C) is different than a water main. The
justification being that 250.52(A)(1) lists requirements for a "metal
underground water pipe" electrode, while 250.52(A)(5) lists "pipe" electrode
separately.  I agree a water main fits the description of a pipe, but I
suppose it could depend on the mood of the inspector.  I've managed to avoid
it myself, but have heard horror stories of 4/0 GECs being required by
inspectors.

Good point about 250.53(D)(2) Supplemental Electrode Required.  Although it
does list a "pipe" again as a possible supplemental electrode to the water
main.

250.166(C) just seems a little unclear with respect to a water main
electrode.  I have seen a number of sites that do not have a supplemental
electrode in addition to the water main, but I suppose you could simply
install a rod, bond it to the water main, and use #6 copper for the DC GEC.

Thanks,

Garrison



-----Original Message-----
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Ray Walters
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 2:22 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Fuse sizing in battery circuits

First, a water main is no longer allowed to be used as the primary grounding
electrode by itself, it needs an additional electrode added to it 25053(D)2.
You still are required to bond to it 250.104(A)1,  but it doesn't count as
the electrode.  Also, 250.166 (C) specifically lists pipe as one of the
exceptions.

R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 4/16/2013 1:06 PM, Garrison Riegel wrote:
Hi Ray and All,

250.166 says the GEC must be sized as specified in (A) Not smaller
than the neutral conductor, or (B) Not smaller than the largest
conductor supplied by the system, except as permitted by (C) through (E).

A water main [as in 250.52(A)(1)] is not listed as an exception in (C)
through (E). So if the GE is a water main wouldn't the GEC "need" to
be 4/0, if the battery cables were 4/0?  Not saying it makes sense,
especially if the water main is 3/4", but this has always made me wonder.

Thoughts?

Garrison Riegel
Project Manager | Solar Service Inc
[p] 847-677-0950 | garri...@solarserviceinc.com

NABCEP Certified PV Installation ProfessionalT


-----Original Message-----
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Ray
Walters
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:52 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Fuse sizing in battery circuits

Hi Drake;

Read down a bit more and 250.166(C) and (D) limit the size of the GEC
to
#4 or #6 max., depending on what electrode is used.
This used to not be the case, and systems in the 90s had 4/0 cable to a
5/8"
electrode: which just like your 1/2" pipe example was absolutely
ridiculous.
R.Ray Walters
CTO, Solarray, Inc
Nabcep Certified PV Installer,
Licensed Master Electrician
Solar Design Engineer
303 505-8760

On 4/16/2013 9:31 AM, Drake wrote:
So, in a standard battery system, with a charge control, ground fault
protection and an array, the DC system will likely need grounding. If
the DC system is grounded, then the battery cables are grounded also.
In 250.166 (B) it says the grounding electrode conductor (GEC) shall
not be smaller than the largest conductor supplied by the system.

If the battery cables are "supplied by the system" doesn't this imply
that the GEC should be the size of the battery cable?  This is the
logic that has led some inspectors to require a 4/0 copper wire to be
bonded to a 1/2" water pipe. This is, of course, technically absurd.
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to