> We could have leading-SPLIT always be a comment marker, even when indentation > is disabled. But I think there's no need; once indentation processing is > disabled, you can indent however you please, and there's no need for a > special symbol.
My ':' wasn't intended to help reduce parens. It serves an orthogonal purpose: visually distinguishing tests and branches in if/cond. In this situation it's simpler to have it not interact with whitespace-sensitivity at all. So far I find it useful even if I can indent however I please. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
