> GROUP is critically important.. you could just use (...) for a nested list of 
> lists.. But since it *DISABLES* indentation processing, you lose all 
> indentation support inside..

Perhaps let inside the bindings of another let is enough of a corner
case that we shouldn't try to support it? As long as we have curly
infix and modern exps inside (...) is life not pretty good?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss

Reply via email to