> GROUP is critically important.. you could just use (...) for a nested list of > lists.. But since it *DISABLES* indentation processing, you lose all > indentation support inside..
Perhaps let inside the bindings of another let is enough of a corner case that we shouldn't try to support it? As long as we have curly infix and modern exps inside (...) is life not pretty good? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
