Kartik Agaram:
> Perhaps let inside the bindings of another let is enough of a corner
> case that we shouldn't try to support it? As long as we have curly
> infix and modern exps inside (...) is life not pretty good?
Absolutely!! That would just be "modern expressions" - which by the current
definition also includes curly-infix.
That's one of the reasons I gave names to each tier - so that you can adopt in
part, if you're not willing to adopt the whole. In particular, some people may
not be willing to adopt an indentation-sensitive notation, as you suggested.
In that case, they can just adopt modern-expressions.
For the most part even modern-expressions are even separable from curly-infix,
except that f{...} is interpreted as (f {...}). It's easier to just declare
that things are cumulative, i.e., that modern-expressions includes curly-infix.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
