>> "readable" seems generic. How about 'sweetexpr'? > > The problem is that sweet-expressions are only one of 3 tiers.
There's lots of precedent for a broad category to have the same name as a sub-category. Like 'cat'. We don't have to be perfectly consistent in choosing names, only in using them. I'm not attached to my name. But readable is too generic. It doesn't stick in my head. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
