Am 27.11.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 08:47:49 schrieb David A. Wheeler: >>> However within "normal" s-expressions or neotheric expressions I'd have >> second thoughts. How would this be parsed?: >> >>> foo bar >>> . aaa . bbb ccc >> >> I agree, that should be an error. It doesn't really make any sense to me >> either. I expect this would continue to be ok: >> >> aaa bbb . ccc >> => >> (aaa bbb . ccc) >> >> And the following would still be an error: >> aaa bbb . ccc ddd
+1 > > That’s also what wisp does: The leading dot is interpreted as > continuation if it’s the first character in a line in > indentation-sensitive code. > > It would be cool to see sweet and wisp move closer together here! +1 How does wisp deal with these? 1.: foo bar . aaa bbb ccc . ddd eee 2.: foo bar . aaa bbb . ccc . ddd eee
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
