Why not have the thread just end by starting a timer instead of sleeping
and looping back through?

> > Why do you call that?  Is this something that you could set 
> a flag at 
> > the thread completion and them perform some other wait loop at the 
> > main thread level?
> 
> Because buse waiting is the lest good choce, when waiting....

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to