Because RB provides the Sleep() method and this is the best design -
instead
of using a relatively unrelated Timer...
Am 02.01.2007 um 18:34 schrieb Dixon, Tom:
Why not have the thread just end by starting a timer instead of
sleeping
and looping back through?
Why do you call that? Is this something that you could set
a flag at
the thread completion and them perform some other wait loop at the
main thread level?
Because buse waiting is the lest good choce, when waiting....
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
