Namespaces would indeed be very helpful - for two reasons: 1) it would allow for a better way of accessing Declares. A whole bunch of declares could be put inside a given namespace,m removing the need to have to keep declaring the same API functions inside every RB method that calls it
2) it would facilitate much better support for incorporating 3rd party code into projects - whether RB based through DLL declares or plugins. My idea for namespaces would be to implement them simply as a special type of RB project folder. Any RB class, module,interface or window placed inside such a folder would then be accessed by using the namespace name as a dot prefix. On 1/2/07 16:55, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 01, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > >> Sure. But only the IDE and small amounts of the frameworks so far. >> To fully >> realise that goal RB needs to support other features of C++ such as >> generating DLLs and support for templates and namespaces. > > They need to make small steps first and I'm sure those things are on > the radar > > Creating DLL's and plugins for other tools (ie/ Photoshop plugins) is > on the list of things they've said they'd like to do > > Not sure that templates are required. They might be nice, but not > required. > Same for namespaces. > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
