I would never want RS to be using the most current version. One release behind current would be ok though.
On 1/2/07 19:52, "Giovanni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do see your point and agree, its just that if RS is not using the most > current version, it is almost pointless to develop RB in RB. Hence the > reason why bugs persist. > > > > Daniel Stenning wrote: >> On 1/2/07 19:34, "Giovanni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I have been following the thread and having come from VS and VB, I dont >>> get the point of Making RB from RB. >>> >>> 1- Wouldnt C++ give you everything you need to create a massive >>> developing tool? >>> >> >> Obviously it would, but what better Kudos could a development tool have but >> the fact that it was written in itself. After all - Visual Studio is >> written in VS, and gcc is written in ... Gcc :) >> >> >>> 2- Shouldnt RB test their stuff before releasing it? If they tested or >>> debug the application and features they are releasing, shouldnt all this >>> bugs be fixed? >>> >> >> Testing stuff before a release applies whether or not RB is written in RB or >> C++ >> >> >>> 3- Are we paying beta testers? >>> >>> It seems to me that the issues should not be DEVELOP USING RB, it should >>> be, why was this feature untested and who is responsible for those >>> features and their releases. >>> >>> I mean, after sitting here reading the threads, I have noticed that some >>> of you are top notch programmers, why isnt RS paying attention or are they? >>> >>> I fail to see why they have to develop in RB, if RB is bugged as it it, >>> it also means that the products being produced by RB are also bugged? >>> >>> >> >> There are very good reasons >> >> 1) it allows RS to experience their own tool DIRECTLY and therefore improve >> it better, >> >> 2) by using it to develop a "hard core" app themselves they are in a good >> position to recognise where improvements need to be made to RB for >> performance, memory management etc.. >> >> >> 3) RB is a hell of a lot more productive to write code in thN to C++. This >> results in the LONG TERM in more reliable RB releases and faster bug fixes. >> >> I know there are at this time a lot of outstanding bug and performance >> issues, but I do think that we will all see the benefits, given time. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: >> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> >> >> Search the archives of this list here: >> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
