You are just repeating the point I made, of course VS is written in C++ but the C++ compiler used is the one in VS. And of course GCC is written in C++ - but it think you will find the compiler used to compile was GCC.
I guess you were in a mood to be pedantic. I now expect a reply stating how I should have used "nitpicking" instead of "pedantic"... On 1/2/07 20:11, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 01, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > >> On 1/2/07 19:34, "Giovanni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I have been following the thread and having come from VS and VB, I >>> dont >>> get the point of Making RB from RB. >>> >>> 1- Wouldnt C++ give you everything you need to create a massive >>> developing tool? >> >> Obviously it would, but what better Kudos could a development tool >> have but >> the fact that it was written in itself. After all - Visual Studio is >> written in VS, and gcc is written in ... Gcc :) > > VS is written in C/C++ as is GCC I suspect > They are compiled with themselves > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
