There is no reason to prefix your class names if you're using RB 200x.
I also think that 5.5 didn't have a problem either, but I can't remember
for sure.
I have a "framework" that contains over 100 items, and RB 200x never
imports the objects in a problematic order. What version do you
experience problems and what kinds of problems?
- Ryan Dary
Andy Dent wrote:
If you are building such a collection of classes and you have
dependencies in class definition is to guarantee the import order by
putting a number in front of filenames, so the alphabetic sort order of
the files matches the dependency. You can then option-drag the entire
lot into a project and have it link correctly.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
