That's OK , but if an r3 is just an early "showstopper fix" then we should still be eligible for a further 3 "proper" releases - ie ones that ADD functionality rather than just fix bugs. I signed up for four upgrades, not a mixture of upgrades and maintenance releases. Having said that, if RS were to rewrite their 12 month upgrade policy in order -say to incorporate two "feature" releases interleaved with two "purely maintenance" releases, I would be happy - at least then we know what we are subscribing to and what we can expect.
On 9/4/07 17:00, "Steve Garman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Maybe there is some justification for an interim "point" release - JUST to >> address the most critical "shop stoppers" - if any are present. Maybe those >> "show- stopper" fixes could be limited to a fixed number - 3 or something >> small and chosen by some form of user vote, just my thoughts.... > > Point releases are a thing of the past. > > <http://www.nilobject.com/2007/04/03/milestone-realbasic-2007-release-2/#comme > nt-7556> > > but there's no reason why r3 should not be released very soon after r2. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
