Well thats where the rubber meets the road. The issue here is what should be included and what not.
I think that RB currently has enough included in the ways of controls, except for the listbox/grid control. This should be included as most RB competitors in the same market have it and RB will benefit from having it.(PRO Version only) As to focus on Editfield VS 3D graphics is pure personal biased. Pleople who need 3D, need it and it should be included in the Pro Version. This is why I was saying that RS should not be trying to build all the tools for us, but to have the tools they already have work well. Work well should be key here. I would love better 3D party support. Tim Jones wrote: > > Sorry, Charles, that was just an example of an issue that's come up > previously that I felt was more important than things like 3d > graphics support. The current Editfield is not prone to leaking memory. > > Tim > -- > Tim Jones > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
