Sven E Olsson wrote: > As I could se there is no such example, 1000 pages with 2 pictures > on. Yes, if I could reproduce it, then I should doing that. > Instead I say to my self, NO more (bigger) projects using > REALbasic.
The ability to reproduce the 1000 page document with two pictures per page has been there for a long time. So I think you sold yourself short by not pointing it out to me and thus you robbed yourself of understanding. Even if you couldn't reproduce it yourself, you should of told me since I have intimate knowledge the FTC and could of narrowed it down real quick and explained it to you. > I think the mostly developers of something wanted that, but as I > said, it is not only your tools that is depending on an good > result, it is the whole concept including REALbasic. [snip] > It is not worth a penny, if I not have a solid compiler tool to > compile your code with. > > So perhaps the 3rd parity plugins/classes discussion should start > with the "ground" REALbasic ... Then we could discuss if a > plugin is worth 10 or 1000 dollar.. From another message: > Sorry, I forgotten to show an example of what I mean. > > When I tested you "demo" first time I get an crash... Your > explanation was that was an bug in RB, and so it was. > Just that bug is fixed now, but it take more than one year to fix! So > just in that time when I tested first time, my rate would be zero. > http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=chqeepni Maybe I am just misunderstanding you, but this doesn't make sense. If that is the way you feel about the RB environment in general, then why were you looking at the FTC in the first place? The RB environment is relatively stable and people are producing polished professional applications with it, so I don't see the connection. Sure it has problems, but it is not a doomsday scenario and I have had to workaround a handful of bugs in the RB framework while creating the FTC (like the one you pointed out above). The RB environment is what it is, but this is not germane to the pricing of third party vendor tools in the context of this discussion. Obviously you are on the NUG and using RB for a reason which we all can appreciate. I agree that RS needs to squash these legacy bugs and if you look at their release notes, it shows that is what they are doing. The numbers don't lie. When the FTC is finished, you will be well pleased with the results and it will be worth the $450 price tag. So just hold on. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
