I hope not! I suspect statically-link precompiled classes/modules would be much easier to manage than full-fledged DLLs, especially now with the new incremental compiling capabilities. Just drop'em in and let the linker do it's thing - compiling DLLs should be an entirely separate issue (though useful in its own right).
Frank. <http://developer.chaoticbox.com/> On 15-May-07, at 4:02 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > This will no doubt come around the same time RS finally allow dynamic > libraries to be build in RB ( since plugins are just that ) > > This is one of the things plenty of us have been after for ages. > > http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=oswhlxub > > > On 15/5/07 19:06, "Ryan Dary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There is another component of the "Third Party Drought" in my >> opinion, >> and that is in the delivery model. Encrypted classes are a joke >> because >> they have been publically cracked several times. What we need are >> pre-compiled code "plugins" that we can make right in REALbasic. >> We can >> take a folder of code and say, "Export Pre-Compiled Plugin" or >> something >> like that and safely deliver code libraries. > > Regards, > > Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
