Heh. I don't think a DOS version of View would be necessary at all. I mean, while I love Windows (that's right, you heard me: I LOVE Windows!!), sometimes I just feel at home in a console. Course, I've been using various personal computers for about 18 years now (and I'm only 24..), since the Commodore Vic20. I still don't like Linux much, but I DO like QNX RTP 6 - but it's a real-time OS with, uh, no real memory cache, so it doesn't really run on a 486 (among other reasons). However, what I *have* done is to install CygWin, which is quite yummy I think. Too bad there's no /core for it, though ;)
**** rick falls wrote: > Hey why not a DOS version of REBOL. With the small footprint of REBOl core I > could dust off and make use of my old 486PC. And REBOl is way easier than > Qbasic. I know that DOS is easier to use than Linux, but well, it is 16bit. And ... I can hardly imagine RT would put their effort into DOS View version :-) -pekr- -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
