The advantage of that over a single function, I suppose, is so that you can derive from a standard base object (or choose from several easy-to-use example objects), with the four functions [connect read write close] inside.
I would be happy with that, if that was what you were thinking. Also, I see that the user code would be simpler, since you wouldn't need to nest your user code in a switch, and actually, the error handling when error? :state could become a function too. Any other benefits to this approach ? Anton. > I should like to define a common (standard) interface for async protocols. > > I proposed some time ago an object! style, like the View feel, > instead of the > awake function. > > What do you think? > > --- > Ciao > Romano -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
