> /local for local var is only a convention set by RT, but indeed there is no
> difference at all between /local and any other refinements:
that's what I thought...
of course some functions add it ('function 'has) when creating the internal
func call.
> f: has [a b] [print [local a b]]
> f/local 1 2
>
> so one could use any refinements for local vars, only help do not know it.
we actualy often do without noticing it...
like when we reuse a refinement word that is not set by the user...
-MAx
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
