Rosemary Neill's articles seem to express a similar sentiment to a report in this morning's CM about a paper that Noel Pearson has written.- Our Right to Take Responsibility.Full text follows from the CM's web site:
Pearson hits welfare "poison"
30apr99
PROMINENT Aboriginal leader Noel Pearson has appealed to governments to help
break the welfare dependency of indigenous people so they can live more healthy,
dignified lives.Speaking in Cairns this week, Mr Pearson said welfare was "a poison" that had turned
many Aboriginal people into "drunken parasites" and was destroying family and
community life.He also challenged Aborigi nal leaders to cease disempowering their own people
through continually depicting them as "victims".But most of all, Mr Pearson wants Aboriginal people to accept that, along with the
rights comes responsibility – to themselves, their wives, husbands, children, elders
and the general community."The whole Aboriginal policy debate has been about rights – human rights, legal
rights, land rights, individual rights against government and so on," he said."There has been no discussion about our responsibility. There is a defensiveness."
Mr Pearson has written a 42-page discussion paper for Cape York Aboriginal leaders,
titled Our Right to Take Responsibility."We have to get rid of the welfare system from Aboriginal community governance in
Cape York Peninsula, and get rid of the welfare mentality that has taken over our
people," the document says.It states the two key problems affecting Aboriginal people are racism and welfare
dependency."It is time we analysed our condition as a people without being defeated and
paralysed by the racial issues. This is not to say we should forget about racism, or
pretend that it doesn't exist," Mr Pearson wrote."By addressing the concrete social and economic circumstances of our welfare
dependency, we can find the power necessary to prevail against racism."Mr Pearson advocates a changed system in which money coming into communities –
there are 13 on the Cape which are home for about 12,000 indigenous people – is
controlled by "a new interface" between the federal and state governments and
ATSIC.He said the new administration needed to be "holistic and de-welfared" and he is
seeking support for Cape York to be the pilot model for the changed system."Welfare is a resource that is laced with poison and the poison present is the money-
for-nothing principle," Mr Pearson said."In the 1950s and 60s, our people worked hard in the hot sun for red-necked
pastoralists, and people placed value on every penny earned. It is only the welfare
system that has devalued money – because it is not earned."Mr Pearson said the "welfare poison" was progressively breaking down Aboriginal
society – a society that put tremendous pressure on community members to "provide
resources to a parasitic drink-and-gamble coterie"."Since the 1967 referendum, Aboriginal people have believed their right earned was
the right to drink," he said. "What about the responsibility to your children? The
rights that are acknowledged are the rights of people to party, drink, use money in
their own destruction. No talk of rights of children or old people."And why has there been this collapse in responsibility? In my view, it is related to
the nature of the economy under which Aboriginal people are forced to exist – the
poisonous welfare economy."Aboriginal people should participate in the real economy – where you don't get
money for nothing, you have to work. Aboriginal people lived at the lowest, most
miserable end of the market economy for most of colonial history and the time has
come to change all that. Welfare is a parasitic exploiter."The Government is paying these people to sit around the canteen to drink and
destroy the prospects of their children – destroy society. The madness of that system
has to stop."
Thanks to Graham for this response. Seems to me that
this issue (as raised by Noel Pearson) should be occupying the list, more
so than arguments about who said what to whom in a chance meeting and what they
might have meant. Which is not to say the discussion re Karyn's
bio is not important. Incidentally, as a non-Aboriginal person, I
related to Lance's response and would like to thank him for it. I just
can't accept Irene's assertion that "you might be 6th generation here but you
are in your place aboriginal somewhere else." Maybe I misunderstood what
she meant. I lived overseas for a number years, including England, and the
one thing I found out was that I wasn't "of" those places, no matter what my
genes were made of. I was "of" Australia, and that "ofness" is no doubt
quite different to that of First People's but it is still real. But maybe
Irene thinks there shouldn't be any non-Aboriginal people on the list either,
expressing a point of view.
Anyway, I hope we get some comments on the Pearson piece
because it seems to me he has really taken a risk here. But I guess we all
do, everytime we open our mouths.
Tim
- [recoznet2] missed articles ti-no-ta
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Graham Young
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles tim dunlop
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Trudy and Rod Bray
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Bushranger Ned
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Laurie Forde
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Bushranger Ned
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles Trudy and Rod Bray
- [recoznet2] Missed articles Ian Henderson
- Re: [recoznet2] missed articles piet