Hi Tiffany, I think this is fair critique and a discussion that I feel should be better exposed. I know I've laboured this point many times here in the Google Group but the forum discussions within www.solutionexchange.info gets more exposure to the core OpenText team.
What I'm saying by this is that detailing this wish here is like complaining to your colleagues about a fellow colleague behind their back where as providing constructive criticism to their face would be much more valuable (in some cases). It is my task to help influence many of my OpenText colleagues to use the SolEx community platform as well as resources like the Google Group more to be exposed to ideas like this which are quite frankly good tips as you've done a form of market research for us! Realistically however, as SolEx is an OpenText sponsored initiative (even the OT CMO is participating in the blog aggregation feature), then this is going to get more internal eyes over time than the Google Group and the incentives for OT participation would also be greater. In fact, on a similar subject, I'm hoping to (finally) release a (true) beta version of the "Ideas" feature within the next week where such an idea as you've proposed can be posted by yourself into the community and your peers (OT folk as well as Customers and Partners) can vote on whether this is something they want. Clearly, if the community expresses their desire strongly through this, then that facilitates the discussion about getting things like this on the roadmap. Therefore, I hope this resonates with you and hope that you feel encouraged (even slightly) to take action on www.solutionexchange.info. Regards, Dan On Dec 17, 4:11 am, Tiffany <tiffany6...@gmail.com> wrote: > Along with easily managed folder structures, drag and drop into the > text editor directly would be a dream for images and documents. > Like wordpress 3.3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlfnhJD_qIE > > I wonder if OT will ever get there. > Thanks guys. > > On Dec 9, 2:33 pm, Christoph Straßer <christoph.strasse...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Tiffany! > > > We should not expect asset manager improvements for 11.0. The new > > asset manager implementation was moved back to 11.1. (september 2011 - > > roadmap) In the webinar last week the new/improved asset manager was > > removed from the 11.1 roadmap. (Don´t know whether this was due to > > limited space on the powerpoint or due to moving this feature to an > > even later release.) > > 11.0 should primary bring healty improvements under the hood. (64- > > Bit, .NET 4.0 - backend) Hope to see better performance, improved > > stability and minor UI-improvements. (And improved development- > > efficiency for future releases.) Also hope to the new/improved asset > > manager later in the year with 11.1. (The asset manager was ok back in > > 2005. In 2012 i´d like to see a improved UI and some more features > > (e.g. more than one subfolder-level; upload multiple files at once > > without SmartTree-access). And yes we are able to integrate > > specialized Digital Asset Management (DAM) - Systems, but i think the > > out-of-the-box simplified Asset Manager - "DAM" should also bring a > > basic up-to-date featureset.) > > > Kind regards, > > > Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
