> We are rapidly rolling out a wide area network (inter/intra net) with
> over 44 remote linux server boxes (very remote - many hours drive
> away) connected via ISDN and frame relay via cisco routers to our
> central hub and server farm.
> 
> We have UPSs on these linux servers, with powerchute running as a
> daemon.  It works fine.  Well, almost - when power does go out, the
> system goes down as it is told, but left in an unusable state.
> 
> ATX motherboards, yeech!  (I never did like the concept, but that's
> what we have so that's what I have to live with).  They don't power up
> when the power is restored unless the power button is pressed - a big
> problem if the button on the box box is hundreds of km away :)  We are
> looking into getting something like "wake on lan" to manage this
> particular problem (although WoL is not the solution in our particular
> case).

Sounds to me like a configuration problem. I have an ATX system hear built 
on an ASUS card. Powers down and up perfectly well.


> 
> What doesn't work is the halt command, which is issued either on the
> command line or from the pchute daemon - the standard RH6.1 kernel
> OOPS'es badly (and very impressively!) when it actually halts and
> attempts to power doen, locking up the system in an unusable state
> instead of actually shutting off the power.  And in this situation
> nothing BUT a push of the big red button will get things working
> again.


My only problem with the halt command is that when I use it the system 
always turns itself off. I'd rather choose at that time whether the 
computer should wait for me or turn off, not when I build the kernel. To 
be fair, I usually halt the system from gdm of kdm these days; I've not 
yet checked whether recent halt/shutdown commands do what I want.

I've not been in the habit of using RH kernels - I build from tarballs. 
I've never had an oops powering down.

> 
> So from our esperiences, "power off on halt" appears to be badly
> broken in these kernels.
> 
> Before I go off recompiling and upgrading kernels, I'd like to know if
> anyone else has experienced this, and if they know of a working
> solution.  (Eg, will the current rawhide kernel work?)

You won't know if the current rawhide kernel works on your hardware until 
you try it. In your position, I'd try it - it can hardly be worse. But I'd 
be sure to have one of those troublesome boxes in the office and only go 
on a tour of Qld when I got that working.

-- 
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://os2.ami.com.au/os2/ for OS/2 support.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index.


-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to