Steven Boswell wrote: > about them. But is that the kind of change RedHat even wants? They're > not supporting it now; do they have a good reason that hasn't occurred > to me? Not many packages really benifit from the optimizations. The kerenel was only split in the 6.x series (I think) Prior to that everything was 386 versions. Compare the speed of ghostscript for 386 and with march=686. I doubt you'll notixe the difference. -Thomas -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Thomas Dodd
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell