On 6 Mar 98 at 22:37, Paul Fontenot wrote about
"Re: FAT32":
} And the difference would be?
The main difference would be that fat32 uses 32-bit cluster numbers,
while vfat, like msdos, uses 16-bit cluster numbers. Another
difference is that fat32 support is not available in stock 2.0.x
kernels (or Win95 versions other than OSR2).
Does that make it clearer?
} On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, John Higginbotham wrote:
}
} > At 10:14 PM 3/6/98 -0700, you wrote:
} > >Thats' odd, I mount Win95 with: 'mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /dosc/'
} >
} > That's vfat, not fat32.
}...
- Fred Viles (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
