> So, I read how to have both libc-5 and glibc (libc-6).
> I don't even want to start with this.
> I don't need libc-6 at all, so why go thru all of this ?
>
> So, the question is: Can I install RH 5.0 without glibc ?
> I just want libc-5.
> Can I remove glibc now and have just libc-5 ?
>
> If not, I'll install RH 4.1 instead, but I'm trying to avoid
> it...
>
[PT] You don't have to go back to 4.1 but you will
have to use RH 4.2. RH 5.0 has about all of its
software compiled for glibc-2.X.X. So it would be
a long process to recompile everything for libc-5.X.X.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
