Here's some more information regarding djbdns djbdns, the DNS sanity-saver!
http://networking.earthweb.com/netos/article/0,,12083_1446551,00.html http://networking.earthweb.com/netos/article/0,,12083_1450441,00.html http://djbdns.wolfhome.com/ -TIA, Jim- On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 12:52, Gary wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:28:02PM -0500 or thereabouts, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > I was thinking of installing the caching name server RPM, but it runs off > > of bind. So I thought I'd ask if there was some other configuration or > > name server daemon that would be more appropriate for this application, > > i.e., lighter-weight, more secure, etc. (I'm running RH8.0., but I thought > > the answer might be of more general interest.) > > Matthew, > > In my opinion, after looking and using a few, there is only one, and that > is dnscache, which can be installed alone. It is part of the djbdns > programs. It is fast, lightweight, totally secure, far better than BIND, > which is monolithic in terms of having both DNS and Cache together. You > will not be sorry. I will never go back to BIND for content or caching > servers. If you use a content server, tinydns is faster (over 5000 queries > per second), more secure also, *much easier* to set up, etc. > > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html > > > -- > Gary > > sed '/^[when][coders]/!d > /^...[discover].$/d > /^..[real].[code]$/!d > ' /usr/share/dict/words -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
