You're right. The device count is five. I get confused with this whole zero number thing.
...Robert --- Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:30, Robert Vaughn wrote: > > Thanks for the response. I'm still a little lost. > > > You're right on the relationship between > major/minor > > and device names such as sda, sda1, sdb, etc. > > > > The system that we've been working on is connected > to > > an EMC SAN. It uses Redhat AS 2.1 (2.4 kernel). > > > > The problem that I'm trying to solve is where SAR > -d > > lists only the following device names... > > dev8-0 > > dev8-1 > > dev8-2 > > dev8-3 > > dev8-4 > > > > It is these odd device names presented by SAR that > > have been the challenge. It appears that SAR > > maintains the major number but the minor is > actually a > > distinct number (what the MAN means by 'distinct' > is > > rather subjective). > > > > So I see SAR reporting that I have four physical > > devices. > > I am confused. I count 5 - 0,1,2,3 and 4 > > > Bret > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
