-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:04:21 -0800 (PST), Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> > I honestly think it should be disabled, until the person has the direct > > consent of the list owner to run such a bot. > > You don't need anyone's permission to run a procmail filter. That would be > a bad--and silly--precedent to set. The point is, if I replied to a message which contains "unsubscribe" in the subject line -- imagine it would be a message from someone asking how to unsubscribe a machine from Red Hat Network -- I would get such an unexpected auto-reply as private mail. And that is unnecessary and annoying. That's why I'm asking for it to be at least sent with a valid sender address and an explanation who runs that service. In that case I don't see a different to Jeff sending such a message _manually_. ;-) - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Vo9A0iMVcrivHFQRAn5WAJ9J4djt7879h4uGCH4cb759NNungwCfS+et b4nWEeoTAcHfUEaqtB87inE= =6o36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
