-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 17:25:46 +0100, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> >"rpm --help|less", see section "Signature options". ;) > > > > > > Caught me there! Read through the man page too quickly over to verify. > Didn't think to verify the signature. > > rpm -K output: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives]# rpm -K openoffice_1.0.2-2_i386.rpm > openoffice_1.0.2-2_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING > KEYS: GPG#897da07a) > They don't verify. I'm sorry to bother you, but what does this mean? I > downloaded this rpm's from an apt-get source for Phoebe. No. Slowly. Above output can be misleading unless you know how to read it. Since you don't have the corresponding GPG public key installed, you should have added option --nosignature to verify only the package digest (the MD5 checksum). Actually, the checksums of above packages verified fine. Since you have mentioned you had tried rebuilding the RPM database, I don't have any other idea right now. Without physical access to the system or a system where I could reproduce it I don't know how to analyze this further. To me it doesn't look as if uninstall scripts of the older openoffice package cause problems. > I downloaded this rpm's from an apt-get source for Phoebe. Which might be the reason. Phoebe comes with RPM 4.2, for instance. I leave this problem to people with better knowledge of known issues. One other thing, you don't need --nodeps when you upgrade all three openoffice packages _at_once_, e.g. with rpm -Uvh open*.rpm That solves circular dependencies. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+ZOIU0iMVcrivHFQRAnc3AJ9+z/PomMrWLQ4bp5aSt3WpJAeQnwCbBg2c ir7+rmqcJIE/8zDP6/0WRyQ= =y7tL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
