Correct me if I'm wrong, but a .0 release mainly reflects glibc compatability. Maybe something in glibc upgraded so much that calling it 8.1 would make it be too different than normal convention.
8.0 appears to be an odd ball much like Windows ME was for Microsoft. But, I'm sure RH has a very good reason for this - they seem to know what they are doing when "controversial" things like this comes about. -Eric Wood From: "Rick Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What happened to 8.1? I feel that if Red Hat is going to increment in > Full x.0 release numbers, they're going to obsolete alot of their RHCE's > much quicker than if they had made this a x.1. IMHO, there isn't enough -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
