On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:51:32 -0500, Ben Russo wrote
> Ed Wilts wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Does all this discussion mean that no RH 8.1 will be released?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Correct.  Please see
> >http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/leaplist/2003-March/029087.html
> >
> >  
> >
> >>If one goes from 8.0 to 9.0 should it be from scratch (argg...)?  If not, will
> >>the migration be stable (I worry about old items hanging around corrupting the
> >>new stuff)?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >It's not 9.0.  It's 9.
> >
> >I believe that Red Hat is still supporting upgrades - i.e. you can
> >upgrade in place from 8.0 to 9.  The documentation will be out soon -
> >it's always released at the same time as the product so in a week you
> >can check for the definitive, supported approach.
> >
> >  
> >
> If the 9 release is similar to the 8.0.94 iso's I downloaded and 
> installed last week
> I wouldn't try an upgrade if you have anything other than redhat 
> rpm's installed the release is not binary compatable with 
> Codeweavers Office, or many of the third party binary RPM's I had 
> installed.  Something to do with big glibc differences.
> 
> If you have a machine you have been using for a long time with 8.0,
>  I would wait a while before trying to make the move to 9, (just so 
> that you can give all the third party vendors time to catch up in 
> their FAQ's and HOWTO's).
> 
> And if you have any add on binary software products like wineX or 
> Codeweavers
> or Evolution Connector, you should wait until there are "Official" updates.

Of course, "official" support of RH 8 supposedly will stop after 12/31/03. I
think you are correct, however. I am really tired of upgrading. I was looking
forward to seeing 8.1 with the hopes it might clean up some stability issues.
I think I will hang for several months and then decide what I need to do.
Rebuilding systems is starting to be less and less fun. I still run a RH 5.2
system and a RH 7.1 system. However, the RH 5.2 is basically dead since it
will not run some newer things. The RH 7.1 will no longer have "official"
support after 12/31/03 also. Maybe one of the more advanced releases might
make more sense.




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to