On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:07, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On 26 Mar 2003 13:03:39 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:40, Ed Wilts wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:52:02PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > . it's *still* not clear why the jump to 9. > > > > > > Frankly, they don't have to tell you why the name or number anything the > > > way they do. They didn't ask for my opinion either :-) > > > > Well, I for one would like to know exactly why it's called "Red Hat". > > Is this some sort of communist plot? Their logo *does* look rather > > cloak-and-dagger. > > Searching Google for the name of one of Red Hat's founders returns > one possible answer. *hint* Whether it's authentic, I can't tell. > But it makes sense. On the other hand, it could also be a fairytale. :)
I've heard the stories. I was just being funny (or stupid, YPOVMV). -- Cliff Wells, Software Engineer Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net) (503) 978-6726 x308 (800) 735-0555 x308 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
