-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26 Mar 2003 13:03:39 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:40, Ed Wilts wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:52:02PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > . it's *still* not clear why the jump to 9. > > > > Frankly, they don't have to tell you why the name or number anything the > > way they do. They didn't ask for my opinion either :-) > > Well, I for one would like to know exactly why it's called "Red Hat". > Is this some sort of communist plot? Their logo *does* look rather > cloak-and-dagger. Searching Google for the name of one of Red Hat's founders returns one possible answer. *hint* Whether it's authentic, I can't tell. But it makes sense. On the other hand, it could also be a fairytale. :) - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+gk7j0iMVcrivHFQRApGZAJ0UzAQH96cWPdB4JZoPPzCreZCAAwCdEndb 1t6FYPK1lrWNcCZ+IO569Hs= =PI6e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
