Mitchell K. Smith wrote:

I've never used apt before.
Is this really safe?


It's worked well for me for over 6 months. As I live/work on the West Coast in SV the rhn is insanely slow compared to apt-get or a rh mirror. Also I can easily cache the the rpms for either.

traceroute to mirrors.kernel.org (204.152.189.120), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
<stuff>
6 66.250.7.201 (66.250.7.201) 10.008 ms 9.741 ms 9.678 ms
7 g1-0.core02.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.6.5) 9.927 ms 10.567 ms 12.391 ms
8 g50.ba01.b003070-2.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.66.142) 11.659 ms 61.378 ms 74.705 ms
9 isc-2.demarc.cogentco.com (66.250.6.54) 146.461 ms 163.465 ms 70.194 ms
10 mirrors.kernel.org (204.152.189.120) 92.924 ms 16.070 ms 10.464 ms




For beginners especially I would say to stick with the updates that up2date grabs or that you DL from the Red Hat updates ftp server.


Keep in mind unless you start installing new package that are freshmeat only you are getting the exact same updates.


But to each his own....

Mitch




Or rpm -Uvh apt*.rpm apt-get update apt-get upgrade apt-get dist-upgrade

http://freshrpms.net/



-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failures on rpm -Fv updates



Hi Gang,

I grabbed the RH9 updates directory, and am doing a rpm -Fv *
There are a few disturbing errors, most notably this one:

glibc-2.3.2-27.9
error: %post(glibc-2.3.2-27.9) scriptlet failed, exit status 121

This is actually my second go at it - last time caused my system to be unbootable (init disabled all the runlevels because they were spawning too fast... possibly because none of the executables worked anymore?)

Has anybody looked into this?

Thanks,











--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to