On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:38:55 +0200 Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK bridging isn't an option on wireless, at least not for > > this kind of relay network, if it were then it would be possible > > to treat all the nodes as a single segment with no need for > > layer 3 routing. But then again the subject line did suggest a > > routing question not a wireless question ;o) > > my experience with wireless networks aren't that big either, and > that's why I put this question here. The subject line was chosen > from my networking experience. > > What kind of bridging are you mentioning here? Is it possible to > make this network work without having to get into complex routing > tables? Hi Asbjørn, Just meant generic layer-2 bridging so that you didn't have to worry about network layer routing. Was really thinking out loud and hadn't thought it through completely. Anyway, I seem to recall that there is a limitation on most(all?) wireless cards which precludes their use in a bridging setup. The more i think about this option the more complex it seems. As for the routing setup i outlined you're right that it is a tad complex, but it in the end it seems pretty straight forward. To get started you could make all the routing tables static and only add the routing protocols/daemons later to improve reliability. You could test everything out with a few desktops and/or laptops to make sure you had it sorted out before you tried to implement it over any real distances. Anyway, if you pursue this or a different option it would be great to hear from you on your progress and success. Good luck, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list