On 02 Oct 2003 10:43:27 -0500 Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 10:17, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:20:48 -0700 > > Mike Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Given that sendmail.cf is by most sane individuals generated via the > > > > > > file sendmail.mc, what is the impact of updating sendmail via > > > rhnupdate > > > when I only get a sendmail.cf.rpmnew instead of a > > > sendmail.mc.rpmnew? > > > > > > Seems like I might be missing some crucial sendmail parms for > > > security/etc. I certainly don't want to be backporting cf changes > > > into > > > an mc file. My sendmail book is like 3' thick...and I'm not worthy. > > > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > rhn up2date is based on rpm package management. rpm is pretty smart > > about upgrading your system. It knows what files are configuration > > files > > that have been modified by you. In order to preserve your changes it > > does not overwrite configuration files that you've changed. It will > > add > > the ".rpmnew" extension to the new file or save your current file with > > ".rpmsave". Either way it will ensure you don't lose work, but you > > may > > have to do some tweaking after the upgrade. > > > > Sean I think you missed his point. perhaps a better subject would be why > did I not get a sendmail.mc.rpmnew or why did sendmail upgrade overwrite > my sendmail.mc. If this happened then I suggest a bug report be filed. > > Bret > >
I didn't miss it i ignored it... here's one possibility: no change to senmail.mc make -C /etc/mail (regenerates sendmail.cf with new time stamp) rpm upgrade........ Sean. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list