On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Is this working OK now with 2.2.14pre kernels? Any gotchas?
I'm running gcc 2.95.2-compiled kernels all the time without problems.
I haven't checked 2.2.14pre lately (I'm more into 2.3.x ;) ), so I don't
know if you still need to apply patches to fix broken asm() constructs.
I've put up a patch for kernel 2.2.13 (which still needed it) at
http://people.redhat.com/gcc295/ - if 2.2.14pre hasn't been fixed, I'd
tend to assume the patch will work with little or no modifications.
2.95.2 doesn't use strict aliasing (-fstrict-aliasing) by default, which
fixed most of the "problems" with 2.95 and 2.95.1. If you want to
experiment with it (clean source can handle it), use -fstrict-aliasing in
addition to your normal CFLAGS.
LLaP
bero
--
Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM.
-- Bill Gates, 1983
Windows 98 requires 16 MB RAM.
-- Bill Gates, 1999
Nobody will ever need Windows 98.
-- logical conclusion
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
