Rick:
Does this mean that gcc is now called egcs? I thought there was a
discussion going on about gcc-2.95 was needed when rebuilding RPMs to take
advantage of the i586 and i686 optimizations. Is this new egcs a
combination of both of those, or is gcc-2.95 bring left out because it
would cause other packages like kernel-headers to be changed to allow it
to work?
- Mike
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Rick Forrester wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Downloaded the beta ISO for 6.2, burned it and installed it on a
> > machine I have hanging around here. I told it to install everything,
> > and after it was all installed, I tried to determine what version of
> > gcc got installed. To my suprise, none.
>
> > Is this not going to be part of the 6.2 release?
>
>
> Something got tubed along the way. egcs/gcc is a part of the release,
> should be egcs-1.1.2.
>
> best
> rickf
> --
> Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "To get something done a committee should consist of no more than
> three people, two of whom are absent." Robert Copeland
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
