[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Does this mean that gcc is now called egcs? I thought there was a
> discussion going on about gcc-2.95 was needed when rebuilding RPMs to
> take advantage of the i586 and i686 optimizations. Is this new egcs a
> combination of both of those, or is gcc-2.95 bring left out because it
> would cause other packages like kernel-headers to be changed to allow
> it to work?
Nope, it's still called gcc post installation. Seems to be fine for all
purposes; I've built several RPM's for i686, rebuilt kernel, etc, and
all
has been well. What RH has done internally, I've no clue. Don't work
there, mores the pity!
best
rickf
--
Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"To get something done a committee should consist of no more than
three people, two of whom are absent." Robert Copeland
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
