On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Vidiot wrote:

> I found no new RPMs at www.isc.org, just source.  The chart seems to indicate
> that the P3 release is just fine.
> 
> Anyone at Redhat care to comment on the P5 patch not being on line?

Sure, the P5 patch simply isn't important. All the real problems P5 fixed
have been in our RPM as custom patches before.
If you want P5, get the RPM from rawhide or from 6.2beta.

LLaP
beor



-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to