-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...
>>>>>> "v" == Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>v> In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
>v> from fnmatch.c:46:
>v> /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory
>v> make[1]: *** [fnmatch.o] Error 1
>v> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gcc-2.95.2/libiberty'
>v> make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2
>
>
>
Just a quick question here.. I ran into this while doing a compile on a
redhat 6.2 box upon which I did an install that used the "everything"
setting. I was compiling the 0.17 version of Crystal Space, a rather fun 3D
engine I ran across. I checked my rpms and found that glibc-devel and all
the needed rpms had been used. However, /usr/include/bits/errno.h refered
to the linux/errno.h that wasnt there. I also found that asm/errno.h was
missing. These things did exist on other boxes that were 6.0 and or
upgrades from 6.0. They don't seem to exist on newly installed 6.2 boxes.
I got around that by simply ftping the files I needed into place from
working boxes. I was a bit bleary eyed at the time, as I was doing this
compile after a a work day and some overtime, but it did seem a bit strange
to find that kind of missing bit in a "everything" install. It works find
now, but leaves me puzzled. What is actually missing? A link to another
directory to create these missing directories? Or are the directories and
files missing period? Does an everything install fail to trully install
everything? Or is this just a one time slip up? Sorry to rehash the
nighttime / morning discussion, but reading the thread didn't really clear
this up for me..
Jeff Hogg
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
