rpjday wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rick Forrister wrote:
>
> > Charles Galpin wrote:
> > >
> > > I got an announcement this morning that we have a new beta version of Red
> > > Hat Linux (didn't say what version) called wolverine.
> > >
> > > So what was Fisher?
> >
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > Fisher was a regular beta release. Wolverine is, as I understand it, an
> > actual release candidate - beta with fixes in place. 8^)
>
> um, given that there are still some fairly serious unresolved issues
> in wolverine, i'm not sure what you mean by "actual release candidate."
> based on what the announcement identified as still-existing problems,
> it seems clear that wolverine still isn't ready for actual non-beta
> release.
>
> or did you mean something else?
My understanding has always been that release candidates are _still_
betas,
with bugs (known & unknown), but that the configuration and included
elements
are close to the intended goals.
rickf
--
Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Giving power and money to politicians is like giving car keys
and alcohol to teenage boys."
--P. J. O'Rourke
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
