-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Cameron Simpson wrote:
>On 10:33 04 Mar 2002, Frank Carreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >| >>>>>ncftp IS ftp. Comparing it to scp doesn't make sense. >| >>>>>Why not use sftp instead? You are not required to input the path and >| >>>>>it's very much like what you are doing now. >| >>> >| >>>Except that, as far as I can tell, sftp doesn't do directories or >| >>>wildcards; only individual files ... nothing in the man page, at >| >>>least. >| >> >| Does ncftp do directories? I was unaware of any ftp product with this >| ability. If you could I would simply tar/gzip it then sftp the file(s) >| across. > >For directories I tend to use rsync with ssh as the transport. Just >set $RSYNC_RSH to "ssh" and go: Good plan, but one that depends on the existence of rsync on the remote ... - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPIPei79BpdPKTBGtEQILXgCcCuqZYl/lKe0amz34nsMrPc5+DogAniev DiymzXwbnOLnO1xktD6X2wW0 =oZq4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
