OK good lunch and it's quite OK.
Don't know how, don't know why but this time it work.
I HAVE MY glibc RPMs UPGRADED !!!
Except the devel one which is still to the 2.2.4-13....is that bad ? *I
think so*
This time ####################### apears on the screen unless
this morning.
However, for common lib it has just did it until 50% !?
Hooo ! Maybe because of the -devel !!
Ok let's process and then ... KERNELL
Thank you Emmanuel.
Hope I wasn't too much a schmock!
ism.


-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Ismael Touama
Envoye : vendredi 15 mars 2002 14:07
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: dependencies errata ecaetera




On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Ismael Touama wrote:
>
> $ I 'm on i686 so I expect I just need :
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHBA-2001:121-06]*
> - glibc-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm [RHSA-2001:160-09]*

Keep only the one which is in the updates directory right now

$ I applied the 121-06 first and then 160-09.
$ Considered to this in errata description about kernell:
"Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata
relevant to your system have been applied. "

> - glibc-common-2.2.4-19.3.i686.rpm

This rpm doesn't exist.
Only the glibc rpm is availible for i686.
Use the i386 rpm for -common and -devel .

> - glibc-2.2.4-13.i686.rpm [for dependencies]
> - glibc-common-2.2.4-13.i386.rpm [for dependencies]

You shouldn't need these, as far as I know.

$ It's my system who asked for ! as I wrote, for depedencies...
$ The strangest is that upgrade didn't seem to be made.

Emmanuel

ism

_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to