-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Sharkey wrote:
>> http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html >The mindcraft "study" was bought and paid for by Microsoft, and has >been widely shown to be fraudulent and invalid. MANY, many articles >have been written about the multitude of ways in which they skewed >the results to favor MS. In addition, there were some valid criticisms >of Linux in the report, ALL of which have been fixed since that time >with current releases of Linux. In short, linux far surpasses NT >in file server performance given equal circumstances. What I don't understand is why Mindcraft is even still in business. They certainly destroyed their credibility with that nonsense. To the original poster: do your homework before you believe what you read. As several others have pointed out, the paper you cite has been widely and publicly discredited. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPJoTy79BpdPKTBGtEQLmBQCgieu4xk/7gSwUv5hyoHAoMNprvlMAoK7v npnfb8Ua89y400DVRIU3NW8V =lgwO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
